From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: scu: Move register defines to header file Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:09:09 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1295859080-15259-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1295859080-15259-5-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20110125114635.GB13300@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <236d45e400a960cc3b32db538b3a79ae@mail.gmail.com> <20110125121655.GD13300@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110125122924.GF13300@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.77]:51537 "EHLO na3sys009aog106.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831Ab1AYMjL (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 07:39:11 -0500 Received: by mail-fx0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 12so5616704fxm.32 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 04:39:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110125122924.GF13300@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ccross@android.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:linux@arm.linux.org.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 5:59 PM > To: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com; linus.ml.walleij@gmail.com; linux- > omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > ccross@android.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: scu: Move register defines to header > file > > I did mean to include the updated patch: As said in other email will work towards this. > > arch/arm/include/asm/smp_scu.h | 5 +++++ > arch/arm/kernel/smp_scu.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > [....] > > If we need a SMC call, that should happen within the spinlock'd > region via > a function pointer which the platform can set. I can't code that > into this > patch until I know what the SMC call requires as arguments (cpu > number, > power state, or new register value, or mask and bits to set?) No problem. Will update SMC stuff if needed. Regards, Santosh