From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grygorii Strashko Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix susp/resume Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:05:07 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1486598856-3512-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> <20170209.172126.155005439329995220.davem@davemloft.net> <20170209225423.GA15853@khorivan> <20170209.204507.954952367013216032.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170209.204507.954952367013216032.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller , ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org Cc: mugunthanvnm@ti.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, AStarikovskiy@topcon.com List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 02/09/2017 07:45 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Ivan Khoronzhuk > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:54:24 +0200 > >> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:21:26PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Ivan Khoronzhuk >>> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 02:07:34 +0200 >>> >>>> These two patches fix suspend/resume chain. >>> >>> Patch 2 doesn't apply cleanly to the 'net' tree, please >>> respin this series. >> >> Strange, I've just checked it on net-next/master, it was applied w/o any >> warnings. > > It makes no sense to test "net-next" when I am telling you that it is > the "net" tree it doesn't apply to. > > This is a bug fix, so it should be targetting the "net" tree. > Looks like the first fix is for net, but the second one is for net-next I do not see 03fd01ad0eead23eb79294b6fb4d71dcac493855 "net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: don't duplicate ndev_running" in net. -- regards, -grygorii