linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kishore kadiyala <kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: kishore kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	madhu.cr@ti.com, jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com,
	rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] OMAP4-HSMMC: Adding Card detect support
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 11:41:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <w2o7f9d1ffb1005032311udda8b2clcee872f93a51ac51@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100421190827.GH18272@atomide.com>

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * kishore kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com> [100421 11:16]:
>> Since OMAP4's card detection doesn't support GPIO,this patch
>> basically moves card detection API from driver to Board file so
>> that it can handle in both GPIO and NON-GPIO case.
>> This Patch also adds a flag which can differentiate whether the
>> card-detect line is GPIO or NON-GPIO.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishore Kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c   |    1 +
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c           |   74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h           |    1 +
>>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h |    3 +-
>>  drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c         |   29 +-----------
>>  5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
>> index eae7c80..4e8f74e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = {
>>                * but is a phoenix interrupt
>>                */
>>               .gpio_cd        = 384,
>> +             .cd_type        = true,
>>               .gpio_wp        = -EINVAL,
>>       },
>>       {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c
>> index 9ad2295..ca3d4c9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c
>> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>>  #include <linux/string.h>
>>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/i2c/twl.h>
>>  #include <mach/hardware.h>
>>  #include <plat/control.h>
>>  #include <plat/mmc.h>
>> @@ -27,7 +29,11 @@ static u16 control_devconf1_offset;
>>
>>  #define HSMMC_NAME_LEN       9
>>
>> +/* Phoenix Registers */
>> +#define TWL6030_MMCCTRL      0xEE
>
> This define belongs to the twl code.

Agreed.

>
>>  static struct hsmmc_controller {
>> +     struct omap_mmc_platform_data   *mmc;
>>       char                            name[HSMMC_NAME_LEN + 1];
>>  } hsmmc[OMAP34XX_NR_MMC];
>>
>> @@ -42,6 +48,50 @@ static int hsmmc_get_context_loss(struct device *dev)
>>  #define hsmmc_get_context_loss NULL
>>  #endif
>>
>> +static int twl_mmc_get_cover_state(struct device *dev, int slot)
>> +{
>> +     struct omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc = dev->platform_data;
>> +
>> +     /* NOTE: assumes card detect signal is active-low */
>> +     return !gpio_get_value_cansleep(mmc->slots[0].switch_pin);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int twl_mmc_card_detect(int irq)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned i;
>> +     u8 read_reg;
>> +     unsigned res;
>> +
>> +
>> +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hsmmc); i++) {
>> +             struct omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc;
>> +
>> +             mmc = hsmmc[i].mmc;
>> +             if (!mmc)
>> +                     continue;
>> +             if (irq != mmc->slots[0].card_detect_irq)
>> +                     continue;
>> +
>> +             if (mmc->slots[0].nongpio_cd) {
>> +                     /* BIT0 of REG_MMC_CTRL
>> +                      * 0 - Card not present
>> +                      * 1 - Card present
>> +                      */
>> +                     res = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL6030_MODULE_ID0,
>> +                                     &read_reg, TWL6030_MMCCTRL);
>> +                     if (res >= 0)
>> +                             return read_reg & 0x1;
>> +                     return !gpio_get_value_cansleep
>> +                                     (mmc->slots[0].switch_pin);
>> +             } else {
>> +                     /* NOTE: assumes card detect signal is active-low */
>> +                     return !gpio_get_value_cansleep
>> +                                     (mmc->slots[0].switch_pin);
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +     return -ENOSYS;
>> +}
>
> You should just register a separate twl_card_detect function during init
> instead of doing these tests over and over again.

Agreed.

>
>>  static void hsmmc1_before_set_reg(struct device *dev, int slot,
>>                                 int power_on, int vdd)
>>  {
>> @@ -189,8 +239,32 @@ void __init omap2_hsmmc_init(struct omap2_hsmmc_info
>>               mmc->get_context_loss_count = hsmmc_get_context_loss;
>>
>>               mmc->slots[0].switch_pin = c->gpio_cd;
>> +             mmc->slots[0].nongpio_cd = c->cd_type;
>>               mmc->slots[0].gpio_wp = c->gpio_wp;
>>
>> +             /* TWL Card detect can be GPIO based or NON-GPIO Based */
>> +             if (!c->cd_type) {
>> +                     if (gpio_is_valid(c->gpio_cd)) {
>> +                             mmc->slots[0].card_detect_irq =
>> +                                             gpio_to_irq(c->gpio_cd);
>> +                             if (c->cover_only)
>> +                                     mmc->slots[0].get_cover_state =
>> +                                             twl_mmc_get_cover_state;
>> +                             else
>> +                                     mmc->slots[0].card_detect =
>> +                                                     twl_mmc_card_detect;
>> +                     } else
>> +                             mmc->slots[0].switch_pin = -EINVAL;
>> +             } else {
>> +                     mmc->slots[0].card_detect_irq = c->gpio_cd;
>> +                     if (c->cover_only)
>> +                             mmc->slots[0].get_cover_state =
>> +                                             twl_mmc_get_cover_state;
>> +                     else
>> +                             mmc->slots[0].card_detect =
>> +                                                     twl_mmc_card_detect;
>> +             }
>> +
>>               mmc->slots[0].remux = c->remux;
>>
>>               if (c->cover_only)
>
> Once you register separate twl_card_detect during init, this part will
> not be needed.

Agreed

>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h
>> index 36f0ba8..3dfc43a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.h
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct omap2_hsmmc_info {
>>       bool    no_off;         /* power_saving and power is not to go off */
>>       bool    vcc_aux_disable_is_sleep; /* Regulator off remapped to sleep */
>>       int     gpio_cd;        /* or -EINVAL */
>> +     bool    cd_type;        /* Card detect Type:NON-GPIO=true,GPIO=flase */
>>       int     gpio_wp;        /* or -EINVAL */
>>       char    *name;          /* or NULL for default */
>>       struct device *dev;     /* returned: pointer to mmc adapter */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h
>> index a1bac07..521decc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/mmc.h
>> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct omap_mmc_platform_data {
>>               unsigned vcc_aux_disable_is_sleep:1;
>>
>>               int switch_pin;                 /* gpio (card detect) */
>> +             unsigned nongpio_cd:1;  /* NON-GPIO=true , GPIO=false */
>>               int gpio_wp;                    /* gpio (write protect) */
>>
>>               int (*set_bus_mode)(struct device *dev, int slot, int bus_mode);
>> @@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ struct omap_mmc_platform_data {
>>
>>               /* Card detection IRQs */
>>               int card_detect_irq;
>> -             int (*card_detect)(struct device *dev, int slot);
>> +             int (*card_detect)(int irq);
>>
>>               unsigned int ban_openended:1;
>>
>
> Why are you removing *dev from card_detect?

My fault and will retain in next version

>
> Will comment further after that all is fixed. Please also make sure
> omap_hsmmc.c compiles and works as a module.

Sure will test omap_hsmmc.c as module .

Regards,
Kishore

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-04  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-21 18:20 [PATCH 3/7] OMAP4-HSMMC: Adding Card detect support kishore kadiyala
2010-04-21 19:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-04-22  0:11   ` Madhusudhan
2010-05-04  6:11   ` kishore kadiyala [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=w2o7f9d1ffb1005032311udda8b2clcee872f93a51ac51@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com \
    --cc=jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com \
    --cc=kishore.kadiyala@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madhu.cr@ti.com \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).