From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from beavis.ybsoft.com (bradetich.net [209.161.7.161]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF994829 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:38:40 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Harmony on 710 working? From: Ryan Bradetich To: christian@familieschmitt.de Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org In-Reply-To: <3D6E665F.1030000@gmx.de> References: <3D6CDF5A.5090205@gmx.de> <200208281906.14844.helge.deller@sap.com> <3D6E258B.6010600@gmx.de> <1030640071.22367.392.camel@beavis> <3D6E665F.1030000@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: 29 Aug 2002 12:38:38 -0600 Message-Id: <1030646318.19450.398.camel@beavis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: You should not have to compile the modules differently then from the kernel. What happens when you compile both the kernel and modules with CONFIG_IOMMU_CCIO=y? [Note: The ccio_get_fake will return the appropriate NULL if your system does not have any ccio devices.] Sorry, I don't know anything about aumix. Do you have a /dev/mixer? sane permissions? etc? Thanks, - Ryan On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 12:22, Christian Schmitt wrote: > Ryan Bradetich wrote: > > I have a theory on this .... but will probably be dis-reguarded by > > someone more knowledgable :) > > > > I will try to explain what I believe the problem is, and provid a > > quick hack/work around for you to get it working. > > > > > > First can you tell me if CONFIG_IOMMU_CCIO is defined in your > > kernel as this will affect my answer. > > > > > Hello, > > CONFIG_IOMMU_CCIO is set to "y" in the kernel config. I set it to "n", > recompiled the modules and "modprobe harmony" works. > However, aumix doesn't find a mixer device. Is there any way to find out where > the problem is? > > > > -- > Linux - Cause life is too short for reboots > >