From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hancock.sc.steeleye.com (nat9.steeleye.com [65.114.3.137]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8834D48BB for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:25:48 -0600 (MDT) Received: from mulgrave-w.il.steeleye.com (il-ppp.sc.steeleye.com [172.17.6.240]) by hancock.sc.steeleye.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id h8SHOxq21070; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:25:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] linux-2.6 willy From: James Bottomley To: Richard Hirst Cc: PARISC list In-Reply-To: <20030928165631.GS5759@sleepie.demon.co.uk> References: <20030927072449.5AF0F494058@palinux.hppa> <20030928165631.GS5759@sleepie.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: 28 Sep 2003 12:24:26 -0500 Message-Id: <1064769945.10841.1.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 11:56, Richard Hirst wrote: > Only because I didn't get it to work properly when I did the original > 720 support, iirc. The chip does have INTFLY. I _think_ INTFLY worked > a bit, but the driver tended to miss interrupts sometimes. Could easily > have been a driver bug. Was a long time ago now though, so I could be > misremembering. Actually, the 720 is bust in silicon. The 770 has a properly working intfly, but the 720's doesnt work reliably. Actually, the Q720 board this driver also drives is wired to have a special "intfly" from a board register to get around the problem. James