From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hancock.sc.steeleye.com (nat9.steeleye.com [65.114.3.137]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1963E48CE for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:25:47 -0600 (MDT) Received: from mulgrave-w.il.steeleye.com (il-ppp.sc.steeleye.com [172.17.6.240]) by hancock.sc.steeleye.com (8.11.6/linuxconf) with ESMTP id h8SJPiq25899; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:25:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] linux-2.6 willy From: James Bottomley To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Richard Hirst , PARISC list In-Reply-To: <20030928192323.GL24824@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20030927072449.5AF0F494058@palinux.hppa> <20030928165631.GS5759@sleepie.demon.co.uk> <1064769945.10841.1.camel@mulgrave> <20030928192323.GL24824@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: 28 Sep 2003 14:25:43 -0500 Message-Id: <1064777144.10840.17.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 14:23, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 12:24:26PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > Actually, the 720 is bust in silicon. The 770 has a properly working > > intfly, but the 720's doesnt work reliably. Actually, the Q720 board > > this driver also drives is wired to have a special "intfly" from a board > > register to get around the problem. > > Mmm, OK. Did you want me to put the SIMULATED_INTFLY conditionals > back in? It wasn't much code; I've just been focused on ripping out > all the 8xx support, and I completely forgot about the 770. Perhaps. The way I'd envisaged going forwards was to put the Q720 code in there...it does a memory move which causes the card to trigger and interrupt which can be used as an INTFLY. Unfortunately, I lost all my Q770 cards in a lab move, so I've no means of testing them. James