From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] PA8800/ZX1 support committed to 2.6.7-rc2-pa2 Date: 11 Jun 2004 10:02:29 -0400 Message-ID: <1086962549.1949.23.camel@mulgrave> References: <20040604202546.GC18574@colo.lackof.org> <20040605065126.GA28343@colo.lackof.org> <1086444652.1999.20.camel@mulgrave> <20040605210515.GA8098@colo.lackof.org> <1086470366.1999.36.camel@mulgrave> <20040611055819.GA32005@colo.lackof.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: PARISC list To: Grant Grundler Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20040611055819.GA32005@colo.lackof.org> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org > Changing "4 + cnf.cc_shift" (stride=128) to "3 + cnf.cc_shift" > (stride=64) didn't help. This implies the stride is not the problem. The stride in the rest of the PA architecture is either 16 or 32; I'd be surprised if the L1 stide in the 8800 were bigger (smaller stride is actually more efficient since it gives finer control over caching). Could you just hard code it to 32 to make assureances certain that the stride value isn't the source of the segv's? Thanks, James _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux