From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Missing opcodes in PA 2.0 Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:31:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1121610685.5034.1.camel@mulgrave> References: <200507162350.j6GNo79q012011@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: PARISC list To: John David Anglin Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <200507162350.j6GNo79q012011@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: parisc-linux-bounces@lists.parisc-linux.org On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 19:50 -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > I've been reviewing the opcode table for gas an noticed that the > following opcodes appear to have disappeared from PA 2.0: > > { "idtlba", 0x04001040, 0xfc00ffff, "x,(b)", pa10, 0}, > { "idtlba", 0x04001040, 0xfc003fff, "x,(s,b)", pa10, 0}, > { "iitlba", 0x04000040, 0xfc001fff, "x,(S,b)", pa10, 0}, > { "idtlbp", 0x04001000, 0xfc00ffff, "x,(b)", pa10, 0}, > { "idtlbp", 0x04001000, 0xfc003fff, "x,(s,b)", pa10, 0}, > { "iitlbp", 0x04000000, 0xfc001fff, "x,(S,b)", pa10, 0}, > > I'm interested in knowing if PA 2.0 processors still support these > opcodes. These I know ... the answer's no ... that's why we have pa1.1 and pa2.2 specific paths in the tlb miss handler. The rest I've no idea James _______________________________________________ parisc-linux mailing list parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux