From: Jeff Bailey <jbailey@raspberryginger.com>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] check_ivt panic / binutils
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:17:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1159841839.5737.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200610030211.k932BbeR023905@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --]
Le lundi 02 octobre 2006 à 22:11 -0400, John David Anglin a écrit :
> > I bisected the binutils CVS until I found the failure point. It seems
> > that with 2006-04-30 I don't get the check_ivt failure (although the
> > kernel does die immediately after e100 is initialised), but at
> > 2006-05-01, I get the check_ivt failure.
>
> It's not at all obvious why you think this is a binutils bug.
Sorry, the first part of the conversation happened on IRC, my bad.
I was trying to figure out why I was seeing a problem that Joel had
reported before and no-one else was. Kyle got me to try a sid chroot,
and it didn't happen there. Eventually I narrowed down the difference
between a working kernel and a non-working one was whether I was using a
bleeding edge CVS snapshot, or whether I was using the released
binutils-2.17 package.
I'm not claiming I know where the bug is, but I wanted to know what the
change was that happened between a bootable kernel and a non-bootable
kernel.
> > IIR: 0e60109c ISR: 0000000000000000 IOR: 0000000100000000
>
> $ disasm 0x0e60109c
> 0: 0e 60 10 9c ldw 0(r19),ret0
>
> > r16-19 00000000f00003b0 00000000f000024c 00000000f0002b4c 0000000100000000
>
> The r19 value is the problem.
--
Although when you're in the situation that RMS is telling you that
you're being too ideological about freedom, maybe, just maybe, it's
true.
- Matthew Wilcox
[-- Attachment #1.2: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 169 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
parisc-linux mailing list
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-03 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-03 1:09 [parisc-linux] check_ivt panic / binutils Jeff Bailey
2006-10-03 2:11 ` John David Anglin
2006-10-03 2:17 ` Jeff Bailey [this message]
2006-10-03 2:50 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-10-03 2:52 ` John David Anglin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1159841839.5737.13.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jbailey@raspberryginger.com \
--cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox