From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: sym53c8xx_2 data corruption
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:46:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288190807.4692.30.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1010271059230.31946@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 11:04 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Hi
>
> I sent this about twice to linux-scsi and got no reseponse, neither from
> conference nor from Matthew. So I'm sending it here, James, you are the
> maintainer of SCSI, could you please look at the patch and incorporate it
> to the kernel in this cycle?
>
> The problem is that if the disk returns QUEUE FULL, the requests are
> aborted with DID_SOFT_ERROR (rather than DID_REQUEUE), which results in
> too few retries and premature errors. The errors happen mostly on writes,
> resulting in data corruption.
>
> Mikulas
>
> ---
>
> sym53c8xx_2: Set DID_REQUEUE return code when aborting squeue.
>
> When the controller encounters an error (including QUEUE FULL or BUSY status),
> it aborts all not yet submitted requests in the function
> sym_dequeue_from_squeue.
>
> This function aborts them with DID_SOFT_ERROR.
>
> If the disk has a full tag queue, the request that caused the overflow is
> aborted with QUEUE FULL status (and the scsi midlayer properly retries it
> until it is accepted by the disk), but other requests are aborted with
> DID_SOFT_ERROR --- for them, the midlayer does just a few retries and then
> signals the error up to sd.
>
> The result is that disk returning QUEUE FULL causes request failures.
>
> The error was reproduced on 53c895 with COMPAQ BD03685A24 disk (rebranded
> ST336607LC) with command queue 48 or 64 tags. The disk has 64 tags, but
> under some access patterns it return QUEUE FULL when there are less than
> 64 pending tags. The SCSI specification allows returning QUEUE FULL
> anytime and it is up to the host to retry.
So the description isn't really complete. the function is
dequeue_from_squeue which is used to requeue all unissued scbs when the
sequencer is restarted. This doesn't just affect QUEUE_FULL, it affects
everything. As long as the pushback is done before the status is
returned (which it looks like it is), I think the patch after fixing
looks fine.
The problem isn't the actual command which returns queue full ... it's
that the sequencer accepts and queues a pile of commands and then
returns all of them on the first queue full ... that means that deeply
queued commands in the sequencer issue queue can get returned >5 times
on multiple QUEUE_FULL conditions which would cause a failure.
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.36-rc5-fast/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.36-rc5-fast.orig/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c 2010-09-27 10:25:59.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.36-rc5-fast/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c 2010-09-27 10:26:27.000000000 +0200
> @@ -3000,7 +3000,11 @@ sym_dequeue_from_squeue(struct sym_hcb *
> if ((target == -1 || cp->target == target) &&
> (lun == -1 || cp->lun == lun) &&
> (task == -1 || cp->tag == task)) {
> +#ifdef SYM_OPT_HANDLE_DEVICE_QUEUEING
> sym_set_cam_status(cp->cmd, DID_SOFT_ERROR);
> +#else
> + sym_set_cam_status(cp->cmd, DID_REQUEUE);
> +#endif
So the ifdef is definitely wrong. SYM_OPT_HANDLE_DEVICE_QUEUEING is a
leftover from when the driver did explicit internal queueing. Just make
this do DID_REQUEUE and I *think* everything will be OK.
There's a danger in that DID_REQUEUE will requeue forever, so this
working depends on the original failing command being returned with the
correct code (which I think it is, but more eyes looking at this would
be helpful).
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-27 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20101024020337.725094D30@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
2010-10-24 3:03 ` C8000 cpu upgrade problem Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-24 3:43 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-26 2:16 ` PA caches (was: C8000 cpu upgrade problem) Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-26 3:04 ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-26 4:30 ` John David Anglin
2010-10-26 16:02 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 1:29 ` John David Anglin
2010-10-27 2:40 ` John David Anglin
2010-10-27 4:50 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27 8:06 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 8:35 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 14:18 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27 14:07 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27 16:28 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 16:35 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27 16:50 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 17:07 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-28 6:04 ` John David Anglin
2010-10-28 16:55 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27 9:04 ` sym53c8xx_2 data corruption Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 14:46 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2010-10-27 16:19 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 16:37 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-28 5:59 ` Grant Grundler
2010-12-18 20:13 ` PA caches (was: C8000 cpu upgrade problem) John David Anglin
2010-10-24 4:01 ` C8000 cpu upgrade problem John David Anglin
2010-10-26 2:04 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288190807.4692.30.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox