Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: sym53c8xx_2 data corruption
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:46:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288190807.4692.30.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1010271059230.31946@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 11:04 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Hi
> 
> I sent this about twice to linux-scsi and got no reseponse, neither from 
> conference nor from Matthew. So I'm sending it here, James, you are the 
> maintainer of SCSI, could you please look at the patch and incorporate it 
> to the kernel in this cycle?
> 
> The problem is that if the disk returns QUEUE FULL, the requests are 
> aborted with DID_SOFT_ERROR (rather than DID_REQUEUE), which results in 
> too few retries and premature errors. The errors happen mostly on writes, 
> resulting in data corruption.
> 
> Mikulas
> 
> ---
> 
> sym53c8xx_2: Set DID_REQUEUE return code when aborting squeue.
> 
> When the controller encounters an error (including QUEUE FULL or BUSY status),
> it aborts all not yet submitted requests in the function
> sym_dequeue_from_squeue.
> 
> This function aborts them with DID_SOFT_ERROR.
> 
> If the disk has a full tag queue, the request that caused the overflow is
> aborted with QUEUE FULL status (and the scsi midlayer properly retries it
> until it is accepted by the disk), but other requests are aborted with
> DID_SOFT_ERROR --- for them, the midlayer does just a few retries and then
> signals the error up to sd.
> 
> The result is that disk returning QUEUE FULL causes request failures.
> 
> The error was reproduced on 53c895 with COMPAQ BD03685A24 disk (rebranded
> ST336607LC) with command queue 48 or 64 tags. The disk has 64 tags, but
> under some access patterns it return QUEUE FULL when there are less than
> 64 pending tags. The SCSI specification allows returning QUEUE FULL
> anytime and it is up to the host to retry.

So the description isn't really complete.  the function is
dequeue_from_squeue which is used to requeue all unissued scbs when the
sequencer is restarted.  This doesn't just affect QUEUE_FULL, it affects
everything.  As long as the pushback is done before the status is
returned (which it looks like it is), I think the patch after fixing
looks fine.

The problem isn't the actual command which returns queue full ... it's
that the sequencer accepts and queues a pile of commands and then
returns all of them on the first queue full ... that means that deeply
queued commands in the sequencer issue queue can get returned >5 times
on multiple QUEUE_FULL conditions which would cause a failure.

> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c |    4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.36-rc5-fast/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.36-rc5-fast.orig/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c	2010-09-27 10:25:59.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.36-rc5-fast/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c	2010-09-27 10:26:27.000000000 +0200
> @@ -3000,7 +3000,11 @@ sym_dequeue_from_squeue(struct sym_hcb *
>  		if ((target == -1 || cp->target == target) &&
>  		    (lun    == -1 || cp->lun    == lun)    &&
>  		    (task   == -1 || cp->tag    == task)) {
> +#ifdef SYM_OPT_HANDLE_DEVICE_QUEUEING
>  			sym_set_cam_status(cp->cmd, DID_SOFT_ERROR);
> +#else
> +			sym_set_cam_status(cp->cmd, DID_REQUEUE);
> +#endif

So the ifdef is definitely wrong.  SYM_OPT_HANDLE_DEVICE_QUEUEING is a
leftover from when the driver did explicit internal queueing. Just make
this do DID_REQUEUE and I *think* everything will be OK.

There's a danger in that DID_REQUEUE will requeue forever, so this
working depends on the original failing command being returned with the
correct code (which I think it is, but more eyes looking at this would
be helpful).

James



  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-27 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20101024020337.725094D30@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
2010-10-24  3:03 ` C8000 cpu upgrade problem Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-24  3:43   ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-26  2:16     ` PA caches (was: C8000 cpu upgrade problem) Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-26  3:04       ` Kyle McMartin
2010-10-26  4:30         ` John David Anglin
2010-10-26 16:02         ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27  1:29           ` John David Anglin
2010-10-27  2:40             ` John David Anglin
2010-10-27  4:50             ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27  8:06               ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27  8:35                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 14:18                   ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27 14:07                 ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27 16:28                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 16:35                     ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27 16:50                       ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 17:07                         ` James Bottomley
2010-10-28  6:04                           ` John David Anglin
2010-10-28 16:55                             ` James Bottomley
2010-10-27  9:04               ` sym53c8xx_2 data corruption Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 14:46                 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2010-10-27 16:19                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2010-10-27 16:37                     ` James Bottomley
2010-10-28  5:59                     ` Grant Grundler
2010-12-18 20:13       ` PA caches (was: C8000 cpu upgrade problem) John David Anglin
2010-10-24  4:01   ` C8000 cpu upgrade problem John David Anglin
2010-10-26  2:04     ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1288190807.4692.30.camel@mulgrave.site \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox