From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [patch 0/8] parisc: Convert to new irq_chip functions Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:36:08 -0600 Message-ID: <1297100168.8577.42.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <20110206204411.109238550@linutronix.de> <1297094535.8577.3.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin , "James E.J. Bottomley" To: Thomas Gleixner Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:53 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Feb 2011, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 20:45 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > The following series converts parisc to the new irq_chip functions and > > > sets GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED. Compile tested only. > > > > You don't really need one patch per file in the irq function changes do > > you? ... unless you're being rechristened Joe Perches ... > > WTF ? It's damn easier to review and make sure that you did not miss > anything that way. That's not a 100 patches series doing spelling > fixes or other trivial shite. > > Feel free to bulk apply them, I don't care. Next time I'm going to > ignore parisc and just mark it broken, then you can fix it up yourself > as you like. sorry, outgoing humour filter stopped picking up .de addresses for some reason ... I've fixed it ... > > I can't get the last patch to apply ... it looks like there are lots of > > other Kconfig changes besides the one liner it does; what's missing? > > Tested it against -next as well, had to fix up crap there and sent out > that queue instead the one against linus. Actually, you'll be pleased to hear this was entirely my fault: The irq branch of the parisc tree wasn't where I thought it was (it was about a month behind. There's some problem in arch/parisc/kernel.c it's giving me undefined references to irq (oh and some easily fixed compile issues). I'll see if I can sort it out and get back to you. > Yours grumpy, Well, I'd like to be happy ... but I guess after the git cockup I'll have to settle for dopey. James