From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to expand_upwards Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:00:52 +0300 Message-ID: <1303491652.15231.81.camel@jaguar> References: <1303317178.2587.30.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110421220351.9180.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <1303421088.4025.52.camel@mulgrave.site> <1303422566.4025.56.camel@mulgrave.site> <1303480195.2590.2.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter , Andrew Morton , KOSAKI Motohiro , Michal Hocko , Hugh Dickins , linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , x86 maintainers To: James Bottomley Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1303480195.2590.2.camel@mulgrave.site> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org Hi James, On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 08:49 -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > I'm OK with this Kconfig patch. Can someone send a proper patch with > > signoffs and such? Do we want to tag this for -stable too? > > I already did here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=130324857801976 > > I got the wrong linux-mm email address, though (I thought you were on > vger). Grr, it's a SLUB patch and you didn't CC any of the maintainers! If that was an attempt to sneak it past me, that's not cool. And if you left it out by mistake, that's not cool either! > I've got a parisc specific patch already for this (also for stable), so > I can just queue this alongside if everyone's OK with that? Feel free, I'm not subscribed to linux-arch so I don't have the patch in my inbox at all: Acked-by: Pekka Enberg Pekka