From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rolf Eike Beer Subject: Re: [PATCH] parisc: unbreak automounter support on 64-bit kernel with 32-bit userspace Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:10:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1470501.uiZyX6kBKo@donald.sf-tec.de> References: <20130131200110.GA6032@p100.box> <1359668524.2468.12.camel@dabdike> <510AE623.7000609@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6267936.Gb1GP3pgWl"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: James Bottomley , Helge Deller , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Kent , autofs@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <510AE623.7000609@zytor.com> List-ID: List-Id: linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org --nextPart6267936.Gb1GP3pgWl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/31/2013 01:42 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 13:29 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> On 01/31/2013 12:26 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > >>> [adding autofs list and maintainer for their perusal and ack, although > >>> this is an obvious fix to me > >>> > >>> James] > >> > >> The #if list probably should be inverted, and only specific platforms > >> should have unsigned long... > > > > The whitelist is 64 bit only platforms, like ia64, isn't it? So yes, > > they're far less numerous. > > Correct. It is basically the 64-bit platforms without any 32-bit > userspace, like Alpha and IA64. Arm64? Should this be a CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_HAVE_32BIT_USERSPACE that would cover this? And may e.g. be used to remove compat_ioctl on those archs, too? Eike --nextPart6267936.Gb1GP3pgWl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlEK68kACgkQXKSJPmm5/E6d6ACfQXJciVY9c8+cXb/hw98Spx9d jh8Anj+sHsqqiRcYfHzgCgV2g7s3DiQ5 =HJ+k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6267936.Gb1GP3pgWl--