From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55])
	by sod.res.cmu.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA04212
	for <parisc-linux@sod.res.cmu.edu>; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:46:20 -0500
Message-ID: <19990329164613.H1081@cmu.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:46:13 -0500
From: Phil Schwan <pschwan@cmu.edu>
To: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: [parisc-linux] Mailing list behaviour
List-ID: <linux-parisc.vger.kernel.org>

By request, I've asked smartlist to please stop mangling (or adding,
in most cases) a Reply-to field.  There are compelling arguments for
and against, but leaving it out really does make more sense.  Note
that a simple ``Reply'' command to your mailer will probably not work
for future mails--you'll want to use the ``Group reply'' feature.

-Phil

------------------------------------------------------------------
"In film you will find four basic story lines. Man versus man, man
versus nature, nature versus nature, and dog versus vampire."
        - Steven Spielberg