From: Kirk Bresniker <kirkb@chrome.rose.hp.com>
To: grundler@cup.hp.com
Cc: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] different PA2.0 CPUs in the same box?
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 9:55:50 PDT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199910191655.JAA08169@chrome.rose.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199910191604.JAA27382@milano.cup.hp.com>; from "Grant Grundler" at Oct 19, 99 9:04 am
|
| The processors can run from a "system clock" and they all run synchronous.
| No chance of "clock drift" since they run at exactly the same pace.
| But on systems like 870, T-class and N-class, the processors are fed clock
| signals from (similar but) different sources. Each frequency domain will
| slowly drift from the "average" and thus the processor clocks need to be
| resyncronized regularly.
|
Eh? I can't speak to the T-Class, but N-Class processors (as well as
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K, and L) all run from a single clock source. All
of the fundamental problems of clock drift happen between systems, not
interior to a system. The crystals used are usally 25~50ppm, which
would amount to a second or two per day between systems, which is
significant, but is easily sovled using NTP.
There is no time clock in the processor itself, but rather a register
which is incremented every clock tick. That is why you need to know the
frequency of the processor to convert clock ticks to wall time.
I believe that there are some wrinkles that can happen in sensing the
rollover of the interval timer register under all interrupt conditions,
and it may be that this is the 'synchronization' problem that you
are thinking about. But, I don't think that it is due to drift on the
hardware clock circuits.
KMB
--
+============================================================+
| Kirk Bresniker (916) 748-2393 |
| 8000 Foothills Blvd |
| Roseville, CA 95747-5649 |
| kirkb@rose.hp.com |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-19 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-18 23:03 [parisc-linux] different PA2.0 CPUs in the same box? Alex deVries
1999-10-18 23:10 ` Jim Hull
1999-10-19 5:31 ` Grant Grundler
1999-10-19 16:04 ` Grant Grundler
1999-10-19 16:55 ` Kirk Bresniker [this message]
1999-10-20 18:57 ` Grant Grundler
1999-10-19 15:40 ` R Scott Holbrook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199910191655.JAA08169@chrome.rose.hp.com \
--to=kirkb@chrome.rose.hp.com \
--cc=grundler@cup.hp.com \
--cc=parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox