From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (IDENT:qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04790 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 15:41:32 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:41:52 -0500 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Philipp Rumpf Cc: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] C360 shellprompt Message-ID: <20000112164152.C11300@thepuffingroup.com> References: <20000111155321.A14792@tux.mkp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20000111155321.A14792@tux.mkp.net>; from Philipp Rumpf on Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 03:53:21PM +0100 List-ID: On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 03:53:21PM +0100, Philipp Rumpf wrote: > Just so you all know, we get to a shell prompt on the C360 after the > changes which I'm about to commit (blame slow dialup lines). I would > like to know whether we get to a prompt on other PA2.0 machines as well. On the C3000, there is a problem with calling the pdc, as we discussed offline. With the calls to the PDC commented out, we get past the `POSIX Conformance Testing by UNIFIX' line: after __k_t (1) 554 556 558 after __k_t (0) 766 618 628 630 641 645 651 bad magic 6a930530 (should be c0030a80), wq bug, forcing oops. On the L-class (ok, just for a giggle, and the room was too cold :-) : Transferring control to kernel. (At entry point 0x00010000) !. ************* SYSTEM ALERT ************** SYSTEM NAME: uninitialized DATE: 01/12/2000 TIME: 21:22:19 ALERT LEVEL: 7 = reserved REASON FOR ALERT SOURCE: 0 = unknown, no source stated SOURCE DETAIL: 0 = unknown, no source stated SOURCE ID: FF PROBLEM DETAIL: 0 = no problem detail LEDs: RUN ATTENTION FAULT REMOTE POWER FLASH FLASH FLASH OFF ON 0x0000307000FF6292 00000000 00000000 - type 0 = Data Field Unused 0x5800387000FF6292 00006400 0C151613 - type 11 = Timestamp 01/12/2000 21:22:19 A: ack read of this entry - X: Disable all future alert messages Anything else skip redisplay the log entry ->Choice: which is not something I've seen before. Is this at all familiar to someone else? This is presumably being generated by the PAT PDC, so maybe someone with N-class experience could tell me a bit about it?