From: Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au>
To: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server?
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 07:48:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20000301074847.A13653@neep.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000229122439.F9944@thepuffingroup.com>; from willy@thepuffingroup.com on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 12:24:39PM -0500
First of all, thanks to two Robs (Womack and Hoppe), Willy and Grant for
their feedback. With any luck I'll be able to talk 'em into a cheap deal -
especially seeing as it's costing them a fair whack per month for floor space
rental in a data centre, even though it's switched off ...
Willy also said:
> 300 series... aarrrgghh :-) 300/400 series machines are m68k based.
> We are sharing their HIL keyboard driver (share in the sense of `copied
> and made changes but will merge back later' sense), and Steve Shack
> mentioned something about the 300-series STI interface recently.
I'm a bit confused by this. I thought the HP 375 was a PA-RISC thingy.
Certainly there have been numerous people on this list talking about getting
their 315's or whatever to boot the parisc-linux kernel.
Had me a look at the HW database, and it says the 375 carries a 'PA7000'
processor. (As a side note, the link for this in the database,
"http://216.208.98.4/view.php3?type=cpu&name=PA7000 (PCX-S)", made my proxy
server unhappy. Dropping the " (PCX-S)" off the end of it helped.)
Is a PA7000 not a PA-RISC chip?
Showing my ignorance,
Andrew.
--
Andrew Shugg <andrew@neep.com.au> http://www.neep.com.au/
"Just remember Basil, there's always someone worse off than yourself."
"Oh, really? I'd like to meet him ... I could do with a good laugh."
[ Sybil and Basil Fawlty, "Fawlty Towers" ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-01 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-29 17:06 [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? Andrew Shugg
2000-02-29 14:57 ` Robert Womack
2000-02-29 17:24 ` willy
2000-02-29 23:20 ` Grant Grundler
2000-02-29 23:48 ` Andrew Shugg [this message]
2000-02-29 21:03 ` Robert Womack
2000-03-01 0:17 ` willy
2000-03-02 13:02 ` Andrew Shugg
2000-03-02 17:08 ` willy
2000-03-02 18:15 ` Stan Sieler
2000-03-01 4:35 ` Sandy Harris
[not found] ` <38BCA09A.9ABADBD0@cln.etc.bc.ca>
2000-03-05 23:01 ` Sandy Harris
2000-03-05 23:24 ` Barrie Spence
2000-03-06 2:22 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server T. Martin
2000-03-06 11:47 ` Frank Benke
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Barrie Spence
2000-02-29 18:06 ` [parisc-linux] Value of an old K-class server? rob hoppe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-02-29 23:55 Mike Hibler
2000-03-02 17:01 Mike Hibler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20000301074847.A13653@neep.com.au \
--to=andrew@neep.com.au \
--cc=parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox