From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailserv2.iuinc.com (IDENT:qmailr@mailserv2.iuinc.com [206.245.164.55]) by puffin.external.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA04235 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 17:08:54 -0600 Received: from milano.cup.hp.com (milano.cup.hp.com [15.8.80.76]) by palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0648B8FD for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (grundler@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by milano.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with SMTP id QAA02166 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2000 16:14:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010062314.QAA02166@milano.cup.hp.com> To: parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] udelay() inconsistent In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 18:24:21 PDT." <200010060124.SAA05210@milano.cup.hp.com> Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 16:14:02 -0700 From: Grant Grundler List-ID: Grant Grundler wrote: ... > I ditched the __LP64__ code in sba_iommu.c (uses asm("lci..")) in order to > use the same code as 32-bit uses. The scsi "CACHE TEST" failures went away. Fixed. Thanks to John Marvin for pointing out ">>44" should be ">>12" for both narrow/wide-mode kernels... > So if anyone can make the LCI work...I'll think of a suitable reward... > (something better than a 710...perhaps a 4GB, 7200RPM, SE SCSI disk? > or a dual headed GSC graphics card?) ....jsm has all the toys he wants already...we'll think of something... grant Grant Grundler Unix Systems Enablement Lab +1.408.447.7253