From: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: matthew@wil.cx, grundler@cup.hp.com,
parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] tulip DMA mapping
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:12:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001110111220.J32715@linuxcare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200011101016.CAA12058@pizda.ninka.net>; from davem@redhat.com on Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 02:16:11AM -0800
I've quoted the whole of Grants message below, so you can see the
context. It looks like tulip is treating zero as meaning it
doesn't have anything to pci_unmap...
Grant Grundler wrote:
> Hi all,
> I see a "bug" in tulip's usage of mapping services.
> It's not the bug I was looking for unfortunately.
>
> In line 217 of drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.c:
>
> if (tp->tx_buffers[entry].mapping)
> pci_unmap_single(tp->pdev,
> tp->tx_buffers[entry].mapping,
> sizeof(tp->setup_frame),
> PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
>
> 0 is a valid pci_map_single() return value when the system has an IO MMU.
>
> The system will panic before pci_map_single() will fail.
> The driver needs to remember some other way if a buffer was mapped or not.
> Or the Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt should be changed - ie add this
> to the interface definition and I can reserve the 1st mapping
> entry so no-one uses it.
Richard
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 02:16:11AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:18:08 +0000
> From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
>
> > Should I be mailing Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com> directly?
> > Or can someone who knows Jeff point this out to him?
>
> i've cc'd jeff & dave miller on this.
>
> In 2.4.x there is _NO_ error return from the PCI dma functions except
> the consistent DMA mapping ones.
>
> This was an explicit design decision, the dynamic mapping functions
> should never fail, and if they do it is a hard error.
>
> Therefore no drivers need to check for failure, as far as they are
> concerned, there is no failure.
>
> So what is the issue? In 2.5.x I'll add an error return facility
> (BTW: -1 ie. 0xfffffff would probably work as an error value on all
> platforms :-)
>
> Later,
> David S. Miller
> davem@redhat.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe: send e-mail to parisc-linux-request@thepuffingroup.com with
> `unsubscribe' as the subject.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-10 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-09 20:12 [parisc-linux] tulip DMA mapping Grant Grundler
2000-11-10 10:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2000-11-10 10:16 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-10 11:12 ` Richard Hirst [this message]
2000-11-10 11:26 ` David S. Miller
2000-11-10 14:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-03-04 17:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2000-11-10 16:29 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20001110111220.J32715@linuxcare.com \
--to=rhirst@linuxcare.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=grundler@cup.hp.com \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=parisc-linux@thepuffingroup.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox