From: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Christoph Plattner <christoph.plattner@dot.at>,
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] New kernel on 720 + Pa-Linux-0.5: Breakpoint ?
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 00:41:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010403004112.H9198@linuxcare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010403002749.K11435@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>; from matthew@wil.cx on Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:27:49AM +0100
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:27:49AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:17:43AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:51:32AM +0200, Christoph Plattner wrote:
> > > What this in the new kernel ?
> > > A manually inserted breakpoint ?
> >
> > No, you need new user space stuff. It looks like there will be a
>
> Why do you say that? From:
>
> sr0-3 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001
> sr4-7 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
>
> IASQ: 00000000 00000000 IAOQ: 00000000 00000004
>
> it looks like it's a kernel null pointer dereference.
You might well be right; it just reminded me of one of the problems
I saw on my 715/old with bad spinlock alignment.
> > new base tarball Real Soon Now, so it might be easiest to wait a
> > few days for that. Alternatively you could try the file system
> > at
> >
> > http://mkhppa1.esiee.fr/en/download.html
> >
> > which is pretty up to date - havn't tried that myself though.
>
> Works well for me. Though as you say there's a new nfsroot out RSN.
OK, I'm not sure when that was produced relative to my latest glibc
spinlock alignment fix though.
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-02 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-02 22:51 [parisc-linux] New kernel on 720 + Pa-Linux-0.5: Breakpoint ? Christoph Plattner
2001-04-02 23:17 ` Richard Hirst
2001-04-02 23:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-02 23:41 ` Richard Hirst [this message]
2001-04-03 6:55 ` Christoph Plattner
2001-04-03 9:12 ` Richard Hirst
2001-04-03 9:23 ` Christoph Plattner
2001-04-03 13:16 ` Richard Hirst
2001-04-03 21:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-04 7:08 ` Christoph Plattner
2001-04-04 17:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-04-04 20:31 ` Christoph Plattner
2001-04-08 17:08 ` [parisc-linux] Many experience done on 720, but `init' fails !! Christoph Plattner
2001-04-08 17:32 ` [parisc-linux] C180 Progress Marc Eisenbarth
2001-04-09 13:36 ` Matt Taggart
2001-04-09 17:05 ` Marc Eisenbarth
2001-04-08 21:02 ` [parisc-linux] Many experiments on 720, but `init' fails !! Christoph Plattner
2001-04-09 20:52 ` [parisc-linux] Many experience done " Matt Taggart
2001-04-09 21:12 ` Christoph Plattner
2001-04-10 8:46 ` Richard Hirst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010403004112.H9198@linuxcare.com \
--to=rhirst@linuxcare.com \
--cc=christoph.plattner@dot.at \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox