From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE2D482A for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:36:13 -0600 (MDT) Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 14nU9e-00064b-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:36:06 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:36:06 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] FB cleanups Message-ID: <20010412003606.A20002@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20010411211337.C26010@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20010411213458.D26010@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20010411235104.A19570@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from jes@linuxcare.com on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 12:56:01AM +0200 Sender: List-ID: On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 12:56:01AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Then Linus changed his mind. You are still *only* supposed to use > readb/writeb on PCI (and possible ISA) on PCI like devices. I've heard this before. But no-one ever came up with an example of what _was_ `PCI-like'. Since right now our writeb is #defined to gsc_writeb, that leads me to believe GSC is sufficiently PCI-like. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.