From: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Grant Grundler <grundler@puffin.external.hp.com>,
John Marvin <jsm@udlkern.fc.hp.com>,
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] kernel panic
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 15:16:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010524151614.X8736@linuxcare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010523201317.X23718@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>; from matthew@wil.cx on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:13:17PM +0100
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:13:17PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:59:57PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > Exactly. But if the driver is mucking with IRQ enable/disable,
> > does that mean the enable/disable code has to keep reference counts?
> > Don't recall any archs doing that when we did the initial implementation.
>
> cli -> disables irqs on all processors
> __cli -> disables irqs on local processor
> sti -> enables irqs on all processors
> __sti -> enable irqs on local processor
>
> spin_lock_irqsave -> disables interrupts locally, puts the previous
> state into the state variable you supplied and acquires the spinlock
> spin_lock_irqrestore -> releases the spinlock and restores previous
> state from state variable
>
> no need to keep enable/disable counts, the previous state gets stored
> for you. if you're using cli and sti inappropriately, you lose.
You mean like scsi_request_fn() calling spin_unlock_irq(&io_request_lock);
when called at interrupt level?
> OK, the problem is that you are getting into a interrupt loop.
> I see the following repeated sequence on the stack:
>
> intr_extint <-----------+
> do_irq_mask |
> do_irq |
> dino_isr |
> sym53c8xx_intr |
> scsi_old_done |
> rw_intr |
> scsi_io_completion |
> __scsi_end_request |
> scsi_queue_next_request |
> scsi_request_fn | <<<< re-enables interrupts
> scsi_dispatch_cmd |
> <NEXT INTERRUPT> >-----------+
I also found
spin_lock(&lock) can also be used in your interrupt handler if your
device only uses one interrupt: the kernel guarantees that a interrupt
handler is never reentered, even if the interrupt handler runs with
enabled interrupts.
in <http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/kt20000703_74.txt>
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-24 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-23 8:53 [parisc-linux] kernel panic John Marvin
2001-05-23 16:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-23 18:59 ` Grant Grundler
2001-05-23 19:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-24 14:16 ` Richard Hirst [this message]
2001-05-25 4:31 ` Grant Grundler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-07 20:46 [parisc-linux] Kernel Panic marc
2002-09-07 22:08 ` Grant Grundler
2002-09-02 16:37 marc
2002-09-02 16:51 ` Randolph Chung
2001-05-22 8:10 [parisc-linux] kernel panic John Marvin
2001-05-23 2:18 ` Ryan Bradetich
2001-05-23 16:48 ` Stan Sieler
2001-05-22 3:57 Ryan Bradetich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010524151614.X8736@linuxcare.com \
--to=rhirst@linuxcare.com \
--cc=grundler@puffin.external.hp.com \
--cc=jsm@udlkern.fc.hp.com \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox