From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from atlrel2.hp.com (atlrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.202]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F7D482A for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:34:14 -0600 (MDT) Received: from security.hp.com (cranston.fc.hp.com [15.1.44.224]) by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9531950 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:34:13 -0400 (EDT) To: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org From: LaMont Jones Cc: LaMont Jones MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 15:32:59 -0600 Sender: lamont@hp.com Message-Id: <20010524213301.126241872C@security.hp.com> Subject: [parisc-linux] still getting $$dyncall refs in shlibs List-ID: With the new toolchain, sipp still builds a libsipp.so.3.1 trips the bug checker. Checking everything on the system doesn't find any bad libs. Here is the build output for libsipp.so: gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o rendering.o rendering.c gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o geometric.o geometric.c gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o lightsource.o lightsource.c gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o objects.o objects.c gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o smalloc.o smalloc.c gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o transforms.o transforms.c ... gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o xalloca.o xalloca.c gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o phong.o phong.c gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o strauss.o strauss.c gcc -pipe -O3 -fPIC -I../libsipp -c -o teapot.o teapot.c ld --shared -o libsipp.so.3.1 rendering.o geometric.o lightsource.o objects.o smalloc.o transforms.o viewpoint.o basic_shader.o marble.o granite.o mask.o bozo.o bumpy.o planet.o noise.o bezier.o bezier_lex.o pixelbuf.o torus.o cone.o ellipsoid.o prism.o sipp_pixmap.o sipp_bitmap.o wood.o xalloca.o phong.o strauss.o teapot.o -soname libsipp.so.3 -lc ld: bfd assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-hppa.c:941 ld: bfd assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-hppa.c:941 Of course, if the assertion failure actually killed the linker, that would help... I'm at a loss from here - and give it to those who have a clue... lamont