From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0721C482D for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:15:52 -0600 (MDT) Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 15Bixa-0001o6-00 for parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:15:50 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:15:50 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] PALO/kernel-build change proposal Message-ID: <20010617211550.D10186@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200106132122.PAA01189@puffin.external.hp.com> <20010617230316.A3622@neep.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010617230316.A3622@neep.com.au>; from andrew@neep.com.au on Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 11:03:19PM +0800 Sender: List-ID: On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 11:03:19PM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > Grant Grundler said: > As a Debian user I discovered the wonders of Manoj's kernel-package > suite to build Debian packages of kernel source/headers/image/docs from > a single kernel tree. Certainly much easier to install the resulting > kernel-image-*.deb package than fuss about with the various Makefile > targets. I suppose it would be unfriendly though to ask that this > become the standard means of building and installing hppa-linux kernels? > > =) > > I see nothing wrong with Paul's suggestion but hope that kernel-package > is educated about the changes for the hppa architecture. I've grown > fond of it (or too lazy to go back?) ... The changes required for kernel-package have been submitted to Manoj... -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.