From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ati6.ati.stlawrencec.on.ca (unknown [142.155.128.6]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84984482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 06:55:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <001201c10ad2$3beb97b0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> From: "rpengelly" To: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:57:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C10AB0.B4A8FCA0" Subject: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums List-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C10AB0.B4A8FCA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've downloaded the 0.92 install. I ran the md5sum on it and it wasn't = correct. I'm wondering if the problem is that I am downloading to a = windows box and then transferring it to a linux box for netbooting? = would this cause problems with the checksums? ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C10AB0.B4A8FCA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've downloaded the 0.92 install. I ran = the md5sum=20 on it and it wasn't correct. I'm wondering if the problem is that I am=20 downloading to a windows box and then transferring it to a linux box for = netbooting? would this cause problems with the=20 checksums?

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C10AB0.B4A8FCA0-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rhirst.linuxcare.com (pc2-hems4-0-cust95.bre.cable.ntl.com [213.107.176.95]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01175482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 07:09:20 -0600 (MDT) Received: by rhirst.linuxcare.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 878CCB00C; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:07:56 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:07:56 +0100 From: Richard Hirst To: rpengelly Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums Message-ID: <20010712140756.C18375@linuxcare.com> References: <001201c10ad2$3beb97b0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <001201c10ad2$3beb97b0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca>; from rpengelly@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 08:57:40AM -0400 List-ID: On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 08:57:40AM -0400, rpengelly wrote: > I've downloaded the 0.92 install. I ran the md5sum on it and it wasn't correct. I'm wondering if the problem is that I am downloading to a windows box and then transferring it to a linux box for netbooting? would this cause problems with the checksums? The md5sum is for the .gz file: [root@beast current]# md5sum /mnt/parisc/palinux-0.9.2.iso.gz 45b3f776f5e702b02a9e02cd10358c99 /mnt/parisc/palinux-0.9.2.iso.gz [root@beast current]# md5sum /mnt/parisc/palinux-0.9.2-install.iso.gz a7819f5fc2f5418bcdcb1de3068baade /mnt/parisc/palinux-0.9.2-install.iso.gz As they are gzipped files, "gzip -tv " would also verify that they downloaded correctly. I have known some browsers 'helpfully' uncompress .gz during download. If you only have the uncompressed versions the sums should be: [root@beast current]# zcat /mnt/parisc/palinux-0.9.2.iso.gz | md5sum b7f13d7175744e2d204a738f2ab32bc2 - [root@beast current]# zcat /mnt/parisc/palinux-0.9.2-install.iso.gz | md5sum c7e3f1312ea387a27b7ec3b278850ac0 - Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ati6.ati.stlawrencec.on.ca (unknown [142.155.128.6]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E563482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:03:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <000701c10ae4$186cf6a0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> From: "rpengelly" To: "Richard Hirst" Cc: References: <001201c10ad2$3beb97b0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712140756.C18375@linuxcare.com> <001e01c10ad6$588cb4e0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712145615.E18375@linuxcare.com> Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:05:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" List-ID: I downloaded the 0.92 full iso and its checksum did not match any of the one's given. I'm wondering if it may be because I first have to download it form esiee to a windows machine then transfer it via ftp to a linux box. It still seems strange that the file downloads in .gz format but will not unzip. Would you be willing to help me out by sending the files by ftp to my linux box? I don't know if you have a high speed connection or not? Thanks again Ray From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.ireste.fr (mail.ireste.fr [193.52.81.37]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A027A482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:24:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from flambe.ireste.fr (flambe [193.52.81.109]) by mail.ireste.fr (8.9.1a/jtpda-5.3.1) with SMTP id RAA21388 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:26:20 +0200 (MET DST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthieu Le Corre To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:30:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0107121730361D.03565@flambe.ireste.fr> List-ID: ---------- Message transmis ---------- Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:17:11 +0200 From: Matthieu Le Corre To: "rpengelly" Le Jeudi 12 Juillet 2001 17:05, vous avez écrit : > I downloaded the 0.92 full iso and its checksum did not match any of the > one's given. I'm wondering if it may be because I first have to download it > form esiee to a windows machine then transfer it via ftp to a linux box. > > It still seems strange that the file downloads in .gz format but will not > unzip. > > Would you be willing to help me out by sending the files by ftp to my linux > box? I don't know if you have a high speed connection or not? > Thanks again give me your ftp adresse i send it to you the .9.2iso full with correct md5sum > Ray > > > > > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux -- _________________________________________________ Matthieu Le Corre Service informatique Ecole Polytechnique de l'Université de Nantes Matthieu.Lecorre@polytech.univ-nantes.fr 02.40.68.32.23 __________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------- -- _________________________________________________ Matthieu Le Corre Service informatique Ecole Polytechnique de l'Université de Nantes Matthieu.Lecorre@polytech.univ-nantes.fr 02.40.68.32.23 __________________________________________________ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.pangeatech.com (pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com [63.110.32.151]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4244482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:29:58 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 6.03.0009/NU8172.00.4d3e3a24) with ESMTP id ionpgaaa for parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:26:28 -0700 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:29:09 -0700 From: Randolph Chung To: rpengelly Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums Message-ID: <20010712082908.K531@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <001201c10ad2$3beb97b0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712140756.C18375@linuxcare.com> <001e01c10ad6$588cb4e0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712145615.E18375@linuxcare.com> <000701c10ae4$186cf6a0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <000701c10ae4$186cf6a0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> List-ID: In reference to a message from rpengelly, dated Jul 12: > I downloaded the 0.92 full iso and its checksum did not match any of the > one's given. I'm wondering if it may be because I first have to download it > form esiee to a windows machine then transfer it via ftp to a linux box. > > It still seems strange that the file downloads in .gz format but will not > unzip. > > Would you be willing to help me out by sending the files by ftp to my linux > box? I don't know if you have a high speed connection or not? > Thanks again Be careful, Debian uses BSD md5sum instead of GNU md5, some other Linux systems use GNU md5sum. They produce different output for the same input! randolph -- @..@ http://www.TauSq.org/ (----) ( >__< ) ^^ ~~ ^^ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.pangeatech.com (pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com [63.110.32.151]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D9A482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:56:05 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 6.03.0009/NU8172.00.4d3e3a24) with ESMTP id hvnpgaaa for parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:52:42 -0700 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:55:31 -0700 From: Randolph Chung To: rpengelly Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums Message-ID: <20010712085531.L531@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <001201c10ad2$3beb97b0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712140756.C18375@linuxcare.com> <001e01c10ad6$588cb4e0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712145615.E18375@linuxcare.com> <000701c10ae4$186cf6a0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712082908.K531@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010712082908.K531@tausq.org> List-ID: > Be careful, Debian uses BSD md5sum instead of GNU md5, some other Linux > systems use GNU md5sum. They produce different output for the same > input! ..... or maybe i'm just smoking something. ISTR them being different in some cases, but when i tried just now they produce the same output. Argh... sorry to add to the confusion, randolph -- @..@ http://www.TauSq.org/ (----) ( >__< ) ^^ ~~ ^^ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-03.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.18]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 37614482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:58:16 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from andrew@localhost) by guinness.internal.neep.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) id XAA17154 for parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:57:56 +0800 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:57:52 +0800 From: Andrew Shugg To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums Message-ID: <20010712235750.Q17064@neep.com.au> References: <001201c10ad2$3beb97b0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712140756.C18375@linuxcare.com> <001e01c10ad6$588cb4e0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712145615.E18375@linuxcare.com> <000701c10ae4$186cf6a0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712082908.K531@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010712082908.K531@tausq.org>; from randolph@tausq.org on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 08:29:09AM -0700 List-ID: Quoth Randolph Chung: > Be careful, Debian uses BSD md5sum instead of GNU md5, some other > Linux systems use GNU md5sum. They produce different output for the > same input! It does? I've never seen a GNU md5sum. BSD's "md5" program has a different output format although the algorithm is the same. Also the various checksum programs I've found for Windows and Mac OS refer to the algorithm as 'RSA MD5'. The only times I've found a discrepancy between md5sum programs is the Windows command-line one that rudely assumes data is ascii by default and has to be given the '-b' flag for checksums to match those generated under a Unix or Mac. (If you can set me straight off-list I'd be happy to listen.) Andrew. -- Andrew Shugg http://www.neep.com.au/ "Just remember, Mr Fawlty, there's always someone worse off than yourself." "Is there? Well I'd like to meet him. I could do with a good laugh." From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86137482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:13:32 -0600 (MDT) Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 15Kj5m-0007UU-00; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:13:30 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:13:30 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Randolph Chung Cc: rpengelly , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums Message-ID: <20010712171330.M3048@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <001201c10ad2$3beb97b0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712140756.C18375@linuxcare.com> <001e01c10ad6$588cb4e0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712145615.E18375@linuxcare.com> <000701c10ae4$186cf6a0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> <20010712082908.K531@tausq.org> <20010712085531.L531@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010712085531.L531@tausq.org>; from randolph@tausq.org on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 08:55:31AM -0700 Sender: List-ID: On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 08:55:31AM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > > Be careful, Debian uses BSD md5sum instead of GNU md5, some other Linux > > systems use GNU md5sum. They produce different output for the same > > input! > > ..... or maybe i'm just smoking something. ISTR them being different in > some cases, but when i tried just now they produce the same output. > Argh... You're confused with normal sum, I believe. Although GNU sum defaults to BSD-style, so I'm not sure exactly which drugs you're taking :-) -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from puffin.external.hp.com (puffin.external.hp.com [192.25.206.4]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931DD482A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:01:10 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200107121900.NAA17461@puffin.external.hp.com> To: "rpengelly" Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] problems with checksums In-Reply-To: Message from "rpengelly" of "Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:05:31 EDT." <000701c10ae4$186cf6a0$0f809b8e@ati.stlawrencec.on.ca> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:00:15 -0600 From: Grant Grundler List-ID: "rpengelly" wrote: > I downloaded the 0.92 full iso and its checksum did not match any of the > one's given. I'm wondering if it may be because I first have to download it > form esiee to a windows machine then transfer it via ftp to a linux box. Someone once mentioned here that windows machines attempt to download the files as text rather than binaries. You might search in the mail archives from 2 or 3 monthes ago for the original posting. grant