From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C5F482A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:20:46 -0600 (MDT) Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 15bRw4-00010Q-00; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:20:36 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:20:36 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Grant Grundler Cc: Matthew Wilcox , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] iotree thoughts Message-ID: <20010827202036.E525@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200108250559.XAA24615@puffin.external.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200108250559.XAA24615@puffin.external.hp.com>; from grundler@puffin.external.hp.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:59:25PM -0600 Sender: List-ID: On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:59:25PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > I was confused. The Dino built-in discovery doesn't make PDC calls. OK, that clears that up :-) > > So it seems to me that we shouldn't do bus-walks underneath Dino, but > > rely on PDC telling us about the device if it's attached. > > Uhm, "underneath" is ambiguous since both built-ins and PCI devices > are heirarchially below "dino" (iotree view - not HW view). > We need to do PCI bus walks for PCI devices. I mean native buswalks. PCI buswalks are outside the scope of this topic. > I'll assume your statement only refers to Dino built-ins and agree. > FWIW, same is true for LASI devices. Hmm. OK. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.