From: "Carlos O'Donell Jr." <carlos@megatonmonkey.net>
To: baldric-exec@baldric.uwo.ca, rhirst@linuxcare.com,
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, baldric-exec@baldric.uwo.ca
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Users staying up to date.
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:40:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010828114032.C30657@megatonmonkey.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010828151417.CADE037DAD@carmen.fc.hp.com>; from taggart@carmen.fc.hp.com on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:14:17AM -0600
>
> For an x86 -> hppa/hppa64 cross toolchain I use the palinux-autobuilder script
> in the build-tools section of pehc cvs.
>
> For a native hppa toolchain use the debian packages(which several people
> worked very hard on in order to get working so we didn't have to deal with
> building by hand).
>
True, the native hppa toolchain is excellent. But in our case the systems we
are compiling for are much too slow. Our cluster of 715's is great for
proving and testing that your code works in parallel, but nothing short of
dead slow...
Thus we make extensive use of the toolchain on x86.
Ever try building MPICH on a 715/50? :}
Compared to make -j16 on our dual PIII...
> For hppa -> hppa64 cross compilers I still do it by hand.
>
> Are you rolling your own toolchain for fun, or is the stuff on pehc not
> meeting your needs?
>
The palinux-autobuilder, atleast the last one I saw, could not compile
the latest set of sources. I haven't tried in a while. This is really
the whole reason this thread got started... that palinux-autobuilder
wasn't working properly for me :} And now Matthew almost has me signed on
as the maintainer for glibc on hppa!
Also, the notes on http://www.parisc-linux.org/toolchain/index.html should
be changed to reflect the fact that it's not possible to build a system
using said instructions ;)
It should probably be changed to include the steps required to:
a) Roll it by hand (what I was attempting)
b) Use the palinux-autobuilder
It goes without saying that I really _want_ the autobuilder to work.
Maybe I should grab it out of CVS... I had the ftp version.
I noted in my other email, that there are a few finiky things that
the autobuilder must do in order to work (set certain environment variables,
patch glibc, etc...).
Cheers,
Carlos.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-28 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-14 19:40 [parisc-linux] Users staying up to date Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-08-14 19:46 ` Bdale Garbee
2001-08-14 23:27 ` Matt Taggart
2001-08-15 0:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-08-15 1:50 ` Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-08-15 3:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-08-15 3:37 ` [parisc-linux] Users staying up to late. ;) Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-08-17 19:53 ` [parisc-linux] Users staying up to date Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-08-27 23:07 ` Richard Hirst
2001-08-28 4:22 ` Carlos O'Donell Jr.
2001-08-28 14:34 ` Richard Hirst
2001-08-28 15:14 ` Matt Taggart
2001-08-28 15:40 ` Carlos O'Donell Jr. [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010828114032.C30657@megatonmonkey.net \
--to=carlos@megatonmonkey.net \
--cc=baldric-exec@baldric.uwo.ca \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=rhirst@linuxcare.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox