From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pizda.ninka.net (pizda.ninka.net [216.101.162.242]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77031482A for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 17:10:08 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2001 16:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20010902.160859.104033892.davem@redhat.com> To: Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de Cc: thunder7@xs4all.nl, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20010903003437.A385@linux-m68k.org> References: <20010902150023.U5126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20010902195717.A21209@middle.of.nowhere> <20010903003437.A385@linux-m68k.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: [SOLVED + PATCH]: documented Oops running big-endian reiserfs on parisc architecture List-ID: From: Richard Zidlicky Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 00:34:37 +0200 On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 07:57:17PM +0200, thunder7@xs4all.nl wrote: > /* 64 bit systems (and the S/390) need to be aligned explicitly -jdm */ > -#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 || defined(__s390__) > +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 || defined(__s390__) || defined(__hppa__) > # define ADDR_UNALIGNED_BITS (3) > #endif couldn't reiserfs use asm/unaligned.h like anyone else? Seems at least sparc and mips may need the same treatment. Sparc will act correctly for unaliagned accesses. It will trap and run very slowly, but it wont' OOPS and it will give correct results. This is actually required behavior, I don't know why parisc is acting differently. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com