From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.pangeatech.com (pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com [63.110.32.151]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FB0482A for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:01:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 7.00.0018/NU8172.00.4d3e3a24) with ESMTP id saomhaaa for parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:57:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:01:28 -0700 From: Randolph Chung To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] documented Oops running big-endian reiserfs on parisc architecture Message-ID: <20010904180128.D4408@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20010902105538.A15344@middle.of.nowhere> <20010902150023.U5126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20010902.160441.92583890.davem@redhat.com> <20010903002514.X5126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20010903002514.X5126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> List-ID: > > Is it impossible to handle unaligned access traps properly on > > parisc? If so, well you have some problems... > > No, we just haven't bothered to implement it yet. Not many people > use IPX these days. It should be easy to handle kernel unalignment traps in parisc/kernel/unaligned.c like we currently do for userspace (in fact there already is some code to do this). I thought we didn't want to do this though? randolph -- @..@ http://www.TauSq.org/ (----) ( >__< ) ^^ ~~ ^^