From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.pangeatech.com (pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com [63.110.32.151]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3F4482A for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 22:47:34 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 7.00.0018/NU8172.00.e2123c13) with ESMTP id zlfdiaaa for parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:42:55 -0700 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 21:47:25 -0700 From: Randolph Chung To: "Carlos O'Donell Jr." , parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] glibc builds! Message-ID: <20011016214725.I537@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20011016210925.H537@tausq.org> <20011017003549.B11826@megatonmonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20011017003549.B11826@megatonmonkey.net> List-ID: > This is excellent! > > Where can I get the details on the binutils bug? > > I've read the bug-binutils and binutils-cvs and I don't > see anything out of the ordinary (though it's easy to lose track). actually it was a Debian-binutils specific bug. I'm not sure if it's documented in any of the public lists. Ryan was working with the maintainers directly. randolph -- @..@ http://www.TauSq.org/ (----) ( >__< ) ^^ ~~ ^^