From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.pangeatech.com (pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com [63.110.32.151]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E98482C for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 01:31:04 -0700 (MST) Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 7.00.0018/NU8172.00.e2123c13) with ESMTP id tcmwiaaa for parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 01:26:06 -0700 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:30:57 -0800 From: Randolph Chung To: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Message-ID: <20011113003057.H391@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [parisc-linux] to swap or not to swap Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Can someone please explain this to me? It looks like some BE architectures define {read,write}[wl] to do LE swapping (sparc, mipsel, ppc, etc) but others don't (s390, parisc). What is the "correct" behavior? The inX/outX interfaces are all internal-swapped to LE. randolph -- @..@ http://www.TauSq.org/ (----) ( >__< ) ^^ ~~ ^^