From: rbradetich@uswest.net (Ryan Bradetich)
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Ryan Bradetich <rbradetich@uswest.net>,
parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 64bit kernels boot on C200 (finally) :)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:39:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011115203901.A8837@beavis.ybsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011115200102.E25491@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
[ Snip ]
> i'm surprised the network works given the number of warnings when compiling
> lasi_82596.c with a 64-bit compiler.
it does ... that was over a nfs root. I plan on taking a look at the compiler
warnings here shortly. But I have not tested out how much works on the C200+
with a 64-bit kernel ... I have no idea if scsi works, etc. I will play with
it more and see what is br0k3n.... I was just happy to see the login prompt.
> btw, does a 64-bit kernel with the 32-bit wrapper options enabled boot
> on a PAT PDC box like A500?
I'm not sure if I understand the question, so let me try to restate the
question I think you are asking.
If you compile in 32-bit wrapper support into a 64-bit kernel ... can
the same kernel be used on a PAT PDC box like the A500?
No. When I first started down the 32-bit wrapper support, I was going
to make the wrappers smart and use the 32-bit wrappers when needed. I
was talked out of the idea, because on all the boxes that need the
32-bit wrappers do not support > 4G ram, thus there is no advantage
(yes Grant, I know ... some application do benefit from 64-bit kernels)
for running a 64-bit kernel on them. The PDC wrappers are designed to
be used for developement/testing purposes for people with these systems.
(By Making the wrappers a compile time option, it saves an additional
level of indirection for every pdc call).
That help? If not, I'll try again.
- Ryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-16 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-15 19:32 [parisc-linux] 64bit kernels boot on C200 (finally) :) Ryan Bradetich
2001-11-15 20:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-11-16 3:39 ` Ryan Bradetich [this message]
2001-11-16 15:37 ` Michael Wood
2001-11-16 20:02 ` Ryan Bradetich
2001-11-16 4:52 ` Grant Grundler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011115203901.A8837@beavis.ybsoft.com \
--to=rbradetich@uswest.net \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox