From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from puffin.external.hp.com (puffin.external.hp.com [192.25.206.4]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C78482C for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:37:56 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200111161632.JAA25977@puffin.external.hp.com> To: "David S. Miller" Cc: willy@debian.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: parisc scatterlist doesn't want page/offset In-Reply-To: Message from "David S. Miller" of "Fri, 16 Nov 2001 07:33:28 PST." <20011116.073328.129356309.davem@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:32:52 -0700 From: Grant Grundler Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: "David S. Miller" wrote: > Part of the criteria to whether we merge back Jens' code is > if the ports, given reasonable notice (ie. take this as your notice) > have added in the support for page+offset pairs to their pci_map_sg > code. That is what willy was talking about. You asking folks to muck with what's supposed to be working code. > I suggest you do this now, it is totally painless. I would almost > classify it as a mindless edit. Adding two members to a struct is not the problem. The problem is revisiting every usage of ->address in the DMA code and telling driver writers they should be using page+offset. grant