From: Grant Grundler <grundler@puffin.external.hp.com>
To: Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com>
Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.16-pa15 still POWERFAIL(was 2.4.16-pa12 Power failled)
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 10:25:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200112051725.KAA19039@puffin.external.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from Richard Hirst <rhirst@linuxcare.com> of "Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:08:31 GMT." <20011205160831.F7051@linuxcare.com>
Richard Hirst wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:22:17AM +0100, joel.soete@freebel.net wrote:
> This is a bit of debug from my a500, 2.4.16-pa13
>
> request_irq(66, 000000001037fd90, 0x0, IO-SAPIC00-L1, 000000001009bc58)
> request_irq(66, 000000001037c590, 0x0, powerfail, 0000000000000000)
> request_irq(129, 0000000010374ed0, 0x4000000, sym53c8xx, 000000001fe98000)
> iosapic_interrupt(): irq 66 line 1 eoi fffffffffed30840, irq_num 129
> POWERFAIL INTERRUPTION !
>
> Don't claim to understand this, but it looks like "powerfail" has
> requested the wrong irq?
Uhm. looks like a shared IRQ. that explains why I see it when
the lan is ifconfig'd instead. Does powerfail need an exclusive IRQ
in the CPU IRQ domain?
I never had the impression any of the HP9000 servers support
a soft-power switch. Many of the older servers did support "Host
powerfail" - but everything shipped since K-class does not.
I think we will need to figure out how to disable this for PAT boxes
and for DKR-class.
This reminds me:
For PAT PDC boxes, we need to write a "PAT Event Handler"
which has exclusive IRQ on CPU EIRR bit 19 (numbered bass ackwards).
"we" means someone in HP. I don't think any of the documentation
for PAT has been published (or will be published anytime soon *sigh*).
grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-05 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-03 18:44 [parisc-linux] Kernel 2.4.16-pa10 joel.soete
2001-12-04 3:43 ` Phil Anderson
2001-12-04 7:01 ` [parisc-linux] Kernel 2.4.16-pa10: sti console brokrn? joel.soete
2001-12-04 13:43 ` [parisc-linux] 2.4.16-pa12 Power failled (was: 2.4.16-pa10: sti console broken?) joel.soete
2001-12-05 10:22 ` [parisc-linux] 2.4.16-pa15 still POWERFAIL(was 2.4.16-pa12 Power failled) joel.soete
2001-12-05 16:08 ` Richard Hirst
2001-12-05 17:25 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2001-12-06 13:49 ` [parisc-linux] 2.4.16-pa16 Solves POWERFAIL (was: 2.4.16-pa15 still POWERFAIL) joel.soete
2001-12-06 17:28 ` [parisc-linux] Trying C180/current CVS again nick
2001-12-07 4:28 ` Grant Grundler
2001-12-07 4:38 ` nick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200112051725.KAA19039@puffin.external.hp.com \
--to=grundler@puffin.external.hp.com \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
--cc=rhirst@linuxcare.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox