From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.pangeatech.com (pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com [63.110.32.151]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2A5482A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2002 00:05:49 -0700 (MST) Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 7.00.0018/NU8172.00.e2123c13) with ESMTP id yswbkaaa for parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org; Tue, 1 Jan 2002 23:59:47 -0700 Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 23:05:14 -0800 From: Randolph Chung To: John David Anglin Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] new gdb deb for testing, patch for review Message-ID: <20020102070514.GB21302@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20020101184109.GJ2179@tausq.org> <200201011909.g01J9x6v012320@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200201011909.g01J9x6v012320@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > This annoying problem has been around for a long time. Argument > printouts may not be valid at a function breakpoint due to code > motion. hmm.. ok. there are a lot of failures in the gdb test cases though. perhaps someone can investigate these? randolph -- @..@ http://www.TauSq.org/ (----) ( >__< ) ^^ ~~ ^^