From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.pangeatech.com (pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com [63.110.32.151]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9576482A for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:38:27 -0700 (MST) Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 7.00.0018/NU8172.00.e2123c13) with ESMTP id auvglaaa for parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:38:17 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 07:38:17 -0800 From: Randolph Chung To: Bruno Vidal Cc: "parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org" Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] dump driver for parisc-linux: patch vs CVS Message-ID: <20020204153817.GI604@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <3C5E768A.573CC5A2@admin.france.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3C5E768A.573CC5A2@admin.france.hp.com> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > -Do you think it is a good idea to have a dump driver available > in the standart kernel ? > -If yes, who is able to do the code review, and put this dump > module in the CVS ? The usual procedure as I understand it is to post a diff to this list (cvs diff -uNp from the root of your linux tree). People will try it out/post comments and once that is done someone can check this in for you. randolph -- @..@ http://www.TauSq.org/ (----) ( >__< ) ^^ ~~ ^^