From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.pangeatech.com (pxofc151-phx1.pangeatech.com [63.110.32.151]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248EC4830 for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:56:31 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [65.192.22.133] by mail.pangeatech.com (NTMail 7.00.0018/NU8172.00.e2123c13) with ESMTP id chqtmaaa for parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:55:22 -0700 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:59:52 -0700 From: Randolph Chung To: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org Message-ID: <20020421035952.GI7563@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [parisc-linux] unofficial gdb deb on ftp site Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: there is an unofficial gdb debian package at ftp://ftp.parisc-linux.org/unofficial-debs/gdb_5.2.cvs20020401-4.1_hppa.deb this is basically the same as the Debian package, except it has a fix for the '"core" is not a core dump: File format not recognized' bug. A patch has been submitted to the Debian maintainer, but in the meantime if you want you can use this package. I see that Dave has changed hppa-gcc from using stabs to using dwarf2 in gcc 3.2, so things might be quite different once we move to gcc 3.2... but for now gdb is only marginally usable. If anyone is interested in looking at gdb, we seem to have some problems with gdb tracking line info. 'next' doesn't work at all... randolph