From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nevyn.them.org (NEVYN.RES.CMU.EDU [128.2.145.6]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368124864 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 00:57:06 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 02:56:53 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Martin v. Loewis" Cc: Matthias Klose , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org, debian-gcc@lists.debian.org Message-ID: <20020505065653.GA12097@nevyn.them.org> References: <15571.50195.280071.792305@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Subject: [parisc-linux] Re: gcc-3.? compiler for hppa (3.1, 3.1+dwarf2, 3.2cvs20020429?) Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 08:54:06AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > Matthias Klose writes: > > > I would like to get feedback, on which alternative to base the gcc-3.1 > > packages: > > > > a) 3.1 as to be released (without dwarf2 support) > > As Redhat has demonstrated in the past, it is highly desirable that > the distributed gcc is based on a released gcc as close as possible. > If there are serious problems in gcc 3.1-as-released, work with gcc > maintainers to fix them in 3.1.1. Completely seconded. I want the collection of patches that distributors ship with GCC to shrink over time, not grow... -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer