From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: To: phi Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] PAM unable to resolve symbol: pam_sm_cha uthtok In-Reply-To: Message from phi of "Wed, 24 Jul 2002 17:55:41 +0200." <3D3ECDFD.FFC416F6@hpfrcu81.france.hp.com> References: <1027513921.3d3e9e41069a0@webmail.tiscalinet.be> <1027518935.6517.30.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <3D3EAF4A.978D4311@hpfrcu81.france.hp.com> <20020724151011.04630482B@dsl2.external.hp.com> <3D3ECDFD.FFC416F6@hpfrcu81.france.hp.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:44:51 -0600 From: Grant Grundler Message-Id: <20020724184451.685B04838@dsl2.external.hp.com> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: phi wrote: > Ouch didn't suspect this was that deep, I was focusing on this f. pam to > setup. It may not be. > BTW I think I saw the exact same behavior on a 712 does the dcache problem > present there too? No - and I don't expect it on C180 either. So far I've only see it on SMP machines (with SMP kernel). thanks, grant