From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
To: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: [parisc-linux] Breaking PARISC ABI - Testing procedures?
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:41:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020826194135.GC632@systemhalted> (raw)
debian-gcc,
I sense another PARISC ABI breakage coming in the very near
future. The ABI breakage is caused by the following three
items:
1- setjmp/longjmp implementation is flawed (Testing)
2- mcontext_t is incorrect in glibc (BTS #157374)
3- sizeof(long double) is incorrect in gcc and glibc (?)
My main question is:
How does one run a preliminary test to ferret out
possibly problems that were not forseen?
My current procedure is to build a new glibc, create
a chroot, install glibc there and begin building things.
Does anyone have a general procedure for this? Or is
this what experimental or unstable is about? :/
---
I'm working on providing various test cases for "1-" and
I already have a patch in my local glibc tree (the initial
patch made the mistake of not allocating enough room for
jmpbuf - kudos to Randolph for noticing that during RFC).
I have a patch for "2-" and it works, but we have a kernel
bug when copying registers into the sigcontext that gets
passed back to a 32-bit userspace from a 64-bit kernel.
Luckily the old definition of mcontect_t matches the new
sigcontext typedef for accesses to general registers and
floating point registers, so we maintain backwards compat
in that scenario. I would like to note that it has never
worked when running a 64-bit kernel under parisc :}
The last issue will get fixed when I get around to poking
changes at gcc.
c.
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-26 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-26 19:41 Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2002-08-27 15:31 ` [parisc-linux] Breaking PARISC ABI - Testing procedures? John David Anglin
2002-08-27 15:31 ` John David Anglin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-26 19:41 Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020826194135.GC632@systemhalted \
--to=carlos@baldric.uwo.ca \
--cc=debian-glibc@lists.debian.org \
--cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox