From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: To: John David Anglin Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Carlos O'Donell , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] malloc limits In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Wilcox of "Sat, 21 Sep 2002 05:14:17 BST." <20020921051417.P10583@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20020920203724.GD24622@systemhalted> <200209210338.g8L3ccnN005029@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <20020921051417.P10583@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:46:12 -0600 From: Grant Grundler Message-Id: <20020921044612.A753D4829@dsl2.external.hp.com> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:38:37PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > I thought there was a flat memory model. If so, shouldn't it be possible > > for the data section to expand past 0x80000000? > > There is a flat memory model... libs are mapped at 0x4000'0000 so that's > not it. worth looking at /proc/$pid/maps for that process, maybe? is 0x80000000 the address or the size? If it's the size then you get up into 0xc0000000 (which is ok). Getting up into 0xf0000000 - 0xffffffff address is not. grant