From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from www.linux.org.uk (parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk [195.92.249.252]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3CC4829 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 11:00:20 -0700 (MST) Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5) id 18BIrA-0001s9-00; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:00:16 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:00:16 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: John David Anglin Cc: Carlos O'Donell , parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, tausq@debian.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] glibc 2.3.1 - It's alive! - patches Message-ID: <20021111180016.D29998@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <20021111171255.GI8848@systemhalted> <200211111736.gABHaP7E002352@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200211111736.gABHaP7E002352@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>; from dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca on Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 12:36:25PM -0500 Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 12:36:25PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > > Looks like we need some __asm format fixes? > > These are the changes that I had for glibc-2.2.5-14 to build with gcc-3.3. > The string literal change makes the asms ugly but I think we have to live > with it. I don't know the ins and outs of why the change was necessary > but I know the cpp people will not change back. > + stw %rp,-20(%sp)\n\ > + stwm %r4,64(%sp)\n\ > + stw %r19,-32(%sp)\n\ By and large we've preferred the following style which is less ugly, IMO: " stw %rp,-20(%sp)\n" " stwm %r4,64(%sp)\n" " stw %r19,-32(%sp)\n" -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.