Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@baldric.uwo.ca>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>,
	parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, tausq@debian.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] glibc 2.3.1 - It's alive! - patches
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 16:16:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021111211624.GC9704@systemhalted> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021111204248.GB9704@systemhalted>

> 
> With gcc-3.3 experimental (cvs pull as of yesterday):
> 
> make[2]: *** [/math/test-fenv.out] Error 136
> make[2]: *** [/math/test-float.out] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/math/test-double.out] Error 1
> make[2]: *** [/math/test-ifloat.out] Error 1
> make[1]: *** [math/tests] Error 2
> 
> 	= Same as before, I'm going to regen these right now.
> 

Hrm....

test-double.out says:

GCONV_PATH=/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/iconvdata LC_ALL=C   /mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/elf/ld.so.1 --library-path /mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/math:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/elf:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/dlfcn:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/nss:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/nis:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/rt:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/resolv:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/crypt:/mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/linuxthreads /mnt/flaire/src/glibc-upstream-cvs/libc-build-3.3/math/test-double

testing double (without inline functions)
Failure: Real part of: cacos (inf + NaN i) == NaN + inf i plus sign of zero/inf not specified: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: cacos (-inf + NaN i) == NaN + inf i plus sign of zero/inf not specified: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: cacos (NaN + inf i) == NaN - inf i: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: cacos (NaN - inf i) == NaN + inf i: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: cacos (NaN + NaN i) == NaN + NaN i: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: ccosh (0.0 + NaN i) == NaN + 0.0 i plus sign of zero/inf not specified: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: ccosh (-0 + NaN i) == NaN + 0.0 i plus sign of zero/inf not specified: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: ccosh (inf + NaN i) == inf + NaN i: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: ccosh (-inf + NaN i) == inf + NaN i: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: cpow (NaN + NaN i, NaN + NaN i) == NaN + NaN i: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: csinh (0.0 + NaN i) == 0.0 + NaN i plus sign of zero/inf not specified: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: csinh (-0 + NaN i) == 0.0 + NaN i plus sign of zero/inf not specified: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: csinh (inf + NaN i) == inf + NaN i plus sign of zero/inf not specified: Exception "Invalid operation" set
Failure: Real part of: csinh (-inf + NaN i) == inf + NaN i plus sign of zero/inf not specified: Exception "Invalid operation" set

Test suite completed:
  2518 test cases plus 2306 tests for exception flags executed.
  14 errors occurred.


They look to be exception related?

c.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-11 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-11  1:05 [parisc-linux] glibc 2.3.1 - It's alive! - patches Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11  1:19 ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 17:12   ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 17:36     ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 18:00       ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-11 18:20         ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 18:58           ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 20:42       ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 20:57         ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 21:17           ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 21:33             ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12  5:31               ` [parisc-linux] simple testcase for binutils visibility problem Randolph Chung
2002-11-12  5:58                 ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 21:16         ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2002-11-11 22:36           ` [parisc-linux] glibc 2.3.1 - It's alive! - patches John David Anglin
2002-11-11 22:44             ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 22:53               ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 23:27                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-12  0:22                   ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12  1:23                     ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-12  4:13                   ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12 15:44                     ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12 17:42                       ` Jim Hull
2002-11-12 17:53                         ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12 18:43                           ` Jim Hull
2002-11-12 19:02                             ` John David Anglin
2002-11-12 19:31                               ` Jim Hull
2002-11-12 19:38                                 ` John David Anglin
2002-11-13 19:22                       ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-13 20:16                         ` John David Anglin
2002-11-17 21:54           ` John David Anglin
2002-11-18 16:12             ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-18 17:42               ` John David Anglin
2002-11-18 19:30                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-18 19:44                   ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11  1:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2002-11-11  1:32   ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11  1:49     ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11  3:45       ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11  4:26         ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 15:03           ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 15:47             ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 16:26               ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 17:25                 ` John David Anglin
2002-11-11 17:37                   ` Carlos O'Donell
2002-11-11 17:46                     ` John David Anglin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021111211624.GC9704@systemhalted \
    --to=carlos@baldric.uwo.ca \
    --cc=dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=tausq@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox