From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:47:42 -0700 To: "Aaron St. Pierre" Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] linux grundler Message-ID: <20030210164742.GA26525@dsl2.external.hp.com> References: <20030208222242.AA3554829@dsl2.external.hp.com> <20030208222746.GB19683@dsl2.external.hp.com> <20030208232303.B27544@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030209031014.GD19683@dsl2.external.hp.com> <20030209122913.G27544@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20030209191441.GA21938@dsl2.external.hp.com> <20030209212454.GB924@hadron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20030209212454.GB924@hadron> From: grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com (Grant Grundler) Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:24:54PM -0500, Aaron St. Pierre wrote: > In another life Grant Grundler wrote: > > if people care about the last 5% performance, they still have several > > options: > > o build your own kernel > > As far as you know am I the only person, that has reported not being > able to boot a 2.4.20-pa?? kernel compiled either natively or cross ? yes. So it's not an option for you. > > o run HPUX > > > > I've not done or seen any lmbench perf results recently but before hpux > > was 10x faster on context switch/task related stuff. And X11 server Seems I remembered this partially wrong. Linux was slightly faster in lots of areas, ~5x slower on fork/exec/shi, and ~10x slower mmap latency. http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2002-March/015966.html grant