From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pippin.tausq.org (gandalf.tausq.org [64.81.244.94]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F296E4829 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:21:02 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 22:17:10 -0700 From: Randolph Chung To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] some 2.5 kernel profile data Message-ID: <20030418051710.GV25257@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20030414052248.GG25257@tausq.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20030414052248.GG25257@tausq.org> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: In reference to a message from Randolph Chung, dated Apr 13: > i ran 'readprofile' on a 2.5.67-pa3 UP kernel (a500, 64-bit) with > several different workloads. here are the numbers if anyone is > interested. upon future reflection, these profiles are all wrong, because we really need to take a before and after measurement and diff them... what was i thinking? i'll remeasure them this weekend and post new results. meanwhile, i'm putting a diffprof script in cvs, since no one on #kernel seems to know of a "standard" one, and the one i got from wli is in haskell, so i don't understand it, and it doesn't work on parisc :) randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/