From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 17:59:13 -0600 From: Grant Grundler To: John David Anglin Cc: Joel Soete , joel.soete@tiscali.be, xam@cs.ucc.ie, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] compiler & kernel Message-ID: <20030603235913.GA3536@dsl2.external.hp.com> References: <3ED70CF100001190@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <200306031418.h53EI399028101@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200306031418.h53EI399028101@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:18:03AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > ...but the use of static binaries under 64-bit hpux is discouraged. That depends on who you talk to. The library maintainers cring at the thought of an application statically linked and forever carrying around bugs in it. But the perf folks get annoyed that each process has to allocate RAM for *all* the data space used by a shared lib vs just for the parts that get linked in statically. (I hope I remember this correctly). grant