From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pippin.tausq.org (gandalf.tausq.org [64.81.244.94]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E024837 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:02:35 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:05:52 -0700 From: Randolph Chung To: James Bottomley Cc: Joel Soete , Carlos O'Donell , PARISC list , Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 2.6.0-test1-pa1, fails, to, boot, on, rp2430 Message-ID: <20030717160551.GP30257@tausq.org> Reply-To: Randolph Chung References: <20030717001528.GA20610@systemhalted> <3F0BEA8300002113@ocpmta1.freegates.net> <20030717155203.GO30257@tausq.org> <1058457224.2646.60.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1058457224.2646.60.camel@mulgrave> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > > looks like a userspace address.... > > Actually, I think it's an address in a module. If it were from > userspace, it would have the bottom two bits set. > > Unfortunately, I don't seem to have the email you're replying to, so I > can't tell if that's true or not. If we could get the 64 bit compile to > do kallsyms, that would tell you definitively. you can't really do that here because he's getting the address from TOC output from PDC... but to rule this out, joel, can you recompile your kernel without modules (everything builtin) and see what happens? randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/