From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dvmwest.gt.owl.de (dvmwest.gt.owl.de [62.52.24.140]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48625484E for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:31:34 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 19:31:33 +0200 From: Jan-Benedict Glaw To: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] update of libc? Message-ID: <20030918173133.GG12661@lug-owl.de> References: <20030918113157.000037fb.t.riemer@visoel.de> <20030918160249.GC30890@systemhalted> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K4TeRK2lnUi9hBXL" In-Reply-To: <20030918160249.GC30890@systemhalted> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --K4TeRK2lnUi9hBXL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2003-09-18 12:02:49 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote in message <20030918160249.GC30890@systemhalted>: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Tilo Riemer wrote: > > is it dangerous to make an update of libc from 2.2.5 to 2.3.x? > > At the moment I have only remote access to the affected host. >=20 > There is no 2.3.x glibc available for debian, it's currently being > fixed. I apologize for the delay, it's more difficult than usual. No? b132l-1:~# dpkg -l libc6 Desired=3DUnknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=3DNot/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=3D(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=3Dboth-problems (Status,Err: upperc= ase=3Dbad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D-=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D-=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D ii libc6 2.3.1-17.0.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timez= one For me, that one works and seems to be 2.3.x... However, what are current libc's problems? MfG, JBG --=20 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier B=FCrger" | im Internet! | im Ira= k! ret =3D do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TC= PA)); --K4TeRK2lnUi9hBXL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/aev0Hb1edYOZ4bsRAtT/AJ9jWSvyTBUH4e35BZ9j4w8LHgmuMACggsqi julCxZtF6NMSmL5pzouRzjA= =gBiK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K4TeRK2lnUi9hBXL--