Linux PARISC architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
To: Joel Soete <soete.joel@tiscali.be>
Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] N Class SMP pb ?  (follow up)
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:35:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030925233500.GA18861@dsl2.external.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F5CC41F00008D27@ocpmta3.freegates.net>

On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 04:56:26PM +0200, Joel Soete wrote:
...
> As already mentionned in previous mail that I could read many 6, 15 (but
> it seems to be normal in UP kernel those interruption occurs)


Yes - 6 is ITLB miss and 15 is Data TLB miss.

> but (most interesting) it is the very first time that I got
> the message making failed the kernel:
> [...]
> handle_interruption(26, ...).

26 is "Data Memory Access rights Trap".
This sounds normal for Copy-On-Write.

> SMP CALL FUNCTION TIMED OUT (CPU=1)

The IPI handler will time out if the other CPU doesn't ack
the function call with in a second. This is bad.
It means either other CPU never got the interrupt (locked up
with I-bit off) or the "unstarted_count" isn't coherent
between the CPUs.

> handle_interruption(26, ...).
>
> Could this be a pb with sync between cpu time ref?
> (because timeout = jiffies + HZ)

I don't think so since jiffies is a global.
And it's always be measured on the same CPU.

> I have also a look for where this function is called but never see its return
> code tested to launch a 'stack dump' and a stop of system?

You need to find out who is using smp_call_function() and which function
they are trying to invoke. I suspect it's coming from mm/slab.c but
would know which of the three it might be.

grant

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-25 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-25 14:56 [parisc-linux] N Class SMP pb ? (follow up) Joel Soete
2003-09-25 15:41 ` Derek Engelhaupt
2003-09-25 23:35 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-26 15:46 Joel Soete
2003-09-26 16:08 ` Joel Soete
2003-09-26 16:50 ` Grant Grundler
2003-09-27 18:16   ` Joel Soete
2003-09-30 16:31 Joel Soete
2003-09-30 18:50 ` Grant Grundler
2003-10-01  6:48 Joel Soete
2003-10-01 17:20 ` Joel Soete

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030925233500.GA18861@dsl2.external.hp.com \
    --to=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=soete.joel@tiscali.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox