From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pizda.ninka.net (pizda.ninka.net [216.101.162.242]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7353D483E for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 04:50:10 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 03:34:58 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Cc: santosha@india.hp.com, willy@debian.org, randolph@tausq.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, sct@redhat.com Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Fwd: Problems with raw interface. Message-Id: <20030926033458.68dbb768.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <001201c3841a$d5be9900$e5624c0f@india.hp.com> References: <20030925142623.GO13172@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <001201c3841a$d5be9900$e5624c0f@india.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: 1) Please use unified diffs when you post patches. 2) If you insist on using Microsoft Outlook when posting patches at least configure it properly when doing so. By default it is going to turn tabs into spaces and that makes the patch corrupt and unusable by anyone. 2) Your patch is unacceptable because it is taking advantage of internal implementation details of flush_dcache_page() on parisc64 that might not (and in fact, is not) be true on other platforms.